Dean’s Provision no. 27/2017

Organization of doctoral studies at FSV UK

Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences

 

Dean’s Provision no. 27/2017

 

Title:

Organization of doctoral studies at FSV UK

 

In effect from:

5. 10. 2017

 

In Prague on 2 October, 2017

PhDr. Jakub Končelík, Ph.D.

the Dean of the Faculty
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Article 1

Introductory Provisions

This provision follows the Study and Examination Regulations of Charles University (hereinafter referred to as "Regulations" and "University") and the Rules for Organization of Studies at the Faculty of Social Sciences of Charles University, as amended (hereinafter referred to as "Rules" and "Faculty").

 

Article 2

Subject Board

1.       The studies in the doctoral study program are followed and evaluated by the subject board. The subject board in the doctoral study program has at least five members. At least two-thirds of the members of the subject board must be associate professors or professors. At least one third of the subject board must be persons other than members of the academic community of the faculty, at least one of them must be a person other than a member of the academic community of the university. The guarantor of the doctoral study program is the chairperson of the relevant subject board. The members of the subject board are appointed and dismissed by the Rector at the proposal of the Dean of the Faculty, following the statement by its scientific board.

2.       For the purposes of this provision, a member of the academic community of the faculty is an employee who is under labour relations with the faculty.

3.       The subject board reaches a quorum if at least half of its members are present at its meeting.

4.       The proposal considered by the subject board is deemed approved if it has reached the approval of the majority of the members of the subject board present at the meeting.

5.       The subject board may vote on the proposals per rollam in urgent matters and proposals subject to the approval of the subject board and in order to discuss them it is not possible or effective to convene a session of the subject board. Per rollam voting is not possible when approving individual study plans and negotiating and approving annual doctoral studies.     

a)      The announcement of the vote, the text of the proposal and the voting form shall be sent out by the chairperson of the subject board to the members of the subject board through a closed electronic conference. The notice shall state the deadline for assessment and voting, which shall not be shorter than one week following an act of sending.

b)     A proposal considered per rollam is deemed to have been approved if the majority of all members of the subject board approve it.

c)      The record of per rollam voting is approved by the subject board at its next ordinary session. A part of the per rollam voting record is the list of members of the subject board, indicating how each of them has voted.

 

Article 3

Advisor

The advisor is usually associate professor, professor or holder of the scientific degree of DrSc. or DSc. The advisor may be an academic member of staff with the scientific degree (Ph.D. or CSc.) if s/he is a prominent specialist in the relevant field. In this case, the chairperson of the subject board shall explain his/her proposal in writing. The advisor is appointed and dismissed by the Dean of the Faculty on the proposal of the subject board.

 

Article 4

Individual Study Plan

  1. Doctoral study programs are conducted according to an individual study plan (hereinafter referred to as ISP), which must be compiled in accordance with the curriculum defined by the accreditation of a given study program. The content of the ISP is in particular a plan for the preparation of a dissertation thesis, the outline of study obligations, scientific, research or other creative obligations, as well as planned or recommended study stays abroad or other internships or pedagogical activities. The ISP includes a timetable for fulfilling individual obligations. The advisor is responsible for the preparation of the individual study plan; if the student does not provide enough cooperation when it is being compiled, the advisor will prepare it himself/herself. The student is required to submit an individual study plan to the subject board within two months following the beginning of the academic year in which s/he enrolled as a first-year student. The ISP is approved by the subject board of a corresponding doctoral study program. The subject board will discuss the ISP by 15 January of the current academic year at the latest. Having been approved, the individual study plan becomes binding for the student.
  2. The student or advisor shall enter the ISP approved by the subject board into the Study Information System (hereinafter referred to as the SIS), with all the requisites. The study department will print the ISP and place it in the student’s file.
  3. Students who are leaving for a study stay abroad and irrespective of the source of the financing of this stay, are obliged to notify the International Office via email of this fact prior to their departure (in the case of a stay administered by the International Office) and add the study department of FSV UK in a copy. If the stay is not secured by the International Office, the student will only notify the study department prior to the study stay by e-mail. This notice must include the time period of the study stay, the state and the name of the receiving institution where the stay will be undertaken. The student records his/her stays abroad in the SIS.
  4. Not later than before the beginning of each academic year, the student shall submit the specified study activities for the upcoming academic year to the subject board after approval by the advisor, or shall propose any changes to the ISP. Such changes must be entered into the Study Information System.

 

Article 5

Course and Assessment of Studies

1.       The fulfilment of the individual study plan is subject to a regular, but not longer than a yearly assessment, which is presented by the advisor together with a proper justification, and is subsequently discussed and approved by the subject board. A student elaborates detailed records in the SIS to be used in the assessment of the individual study plan. The assessment contains information on the progress of the preparation of a doctoral thesis, publication outputs of a doctoral student, the completed subjects, including the grading, completed classwork, the study stays, the grant researches and other study obligations. The advisor will then check all the records and write an assessment of doctoral student’s studies. In addition to the word assessment, s/he will mark one of the variants of assessment a), b), c). Then the assessment will be forwarded via the SIS to the subject board. It shall discuss the assessment and approve it through voting.

2.       The conclusion of the assessment is the statement that the student

a)      has fulfilled his/her individual study plan,

b)     has not fulfilled some obligations according to his/her individual study plan

c)      has not fulfilled his/her study obligations according to the individual study plan. In such a case, the student has not met the requirement set out in this provision and his/her studies will be terminated.

3.       If, for reasons of special consideration and through no fault of his/her own, the student has failed to completely fulfil the individual study plan, it applies that the student has fulfilled the individual study plan. If the fulfilment of the obligations according to the individual study plan was prevented by serious circumstances which occurred without the fault of the student, s/he may not be assessed by c).

4.       If the student’s assessment is with letter b), the subject board shall determine how the deficiencies shall be corrected and shall specify the deadline; these attributes are considered to be a part of the ISP. The subject board may in case of the assessment with letter b) decide to reduce the doctoral scholarship by up to 50%.

5.       If the student’s assessment is with letter c), the studies are terminated due to failure to meet the requirements related to the study program.

 

Article 6

State Doctoral Examination

  1. The student applies for the state doctoral examination at least one month before the start of the period stipulated for the state doctoral examinations according to the schedule of the academic year.
  2. The application form is submitted by the student to the study department. A copy of the application form for the state doctoral examination is sent to the relevant institute by the study department.
  3. In addition to the application form for the state doctoral examination, the student must submit the advisor’s assessment of the course of doctoral study for admission to the state doctoral examination. In the assessment, the advisor confirms that all the study requirements necessary for admission to the state doctoral examination have been fulfilled. Together with the advisor’s assessment, the student includes an overview of the completed subjects, publications, conferences, grants, study stays and other study obligations according to the individual study plan. If a student does not submit any of these requirements, he/she may not perform a state doctoral examination.
  4. If the student fails to complete his/her state doctoral examination successfully by the end of the 4th year of his/her studies, this is the reason for the proposal for termination of his/her studies due to the failure to fulfil the obligations.
  5. The Dean of the Faculty appoints the chairperson and the examining committee from the ranks of professors, associate professors and experts. Experts must be approved by the scientific board of the faculty as the examiners for the state doctoral examination. The committee must have an odd number and at least one member may not be a member of the faculty's academic community. The number of members of the examining committee present shall not be in the state doctoral examinations less than three. The committee decides on the outcome of the state doctoral examination in a private session after a discussion by voting in the form of a raised hand. If any member of the committee presents such a request, voting shall be conducted in secret, using ballot papers. The present members of the committee may not abstain from voting. The voting is supervised by the chairperson of the examining committee, with the committee deciding by a majority vote.        

 

 State Doctoral Examination (SDE) - Administrative Procedures

D = day of SDE

 D-  dates prior to SDE,    D+  dates following SDE

D-month at the latest

The subject board will stipulate the dates for SDE within the schedule of the academic year.

A request to post the dates on the official board (email is sufficient) will be sent to the study department by the subject board. The date of the SDE must be posted no later than one month before the SDE is held.

The subject board will stipulate the dates for SDE within the schedule of the academic year.

A request to post the dates on the official board (email is sufficient) will be sent to the study department by the subject board. The date of the SDE must be posted no later than one month before the SDE is held.

D-30 days

Students must submit to the study department

  • application form for SDE
  • advisor’s confirmation of completion of all study obligations and other requirements.

D-29 days

A list of students enrolled in SDE is sent by the study department to the institute and the chairperson of the subject board.

D-25 days

An institute sends to the study department:

  • schedule of examination time for individual students
  • proposal for the appointment of a committee for the given date of SDE (to be submitted to the Dean of FSV UK by the chairperson of the subject board).

D-14 days

The study department will announce in the public section of the faculty's website information about SDE, including the name of the doctoral student, names of the chairpersons and members of the committee.

D-14 days

The study department sends an official invitation to the committee members and individual students.

D-1 week

The study department will send an email with the form of the Record of SDE to the institute with all the completed basic data. The study department sends ballot papers to the institute.

D

The Record of SDE on the state examination and the voting at the institute will be compiled:

  • to be signed by a chairperson and at least one other member of the committee
  • the record contains the wording of the questions
  • the examining committee decides by a majority vote
  • the result of the examination needs to be entered – passed/failed

The institute will send the originals of the record to the study department.

D + 1 week

The study department will enter into the files of individual students:

·           a copy of the approval of appointment of the examining committee by the Dean of FSV

·           application form for SDE

·           advisor’s assessment

·           original copy of the record of SDE

·        voting ballots (when used)

 

 

Article 7

Defense of Dissertation Thesis

  1. The defense of the dissertation is held before the examination committee for the defense of the dissertation thesis. The committee is appointed by the Dean from the ranks of the professors, associate professors and experts and must have an odd number of members, three at the minimum. The expert members must be approved by the scientific board of the faculty as members of the committees for defenses of dissertation theses. Opponents of the dissertation thesis are usually associate professors, professors or important specialists in the given field with a Ph.D. or CSc scientific degree.
  2. The committee decides on the outcome of the defense of dissertation thesis in a closed session after a meeting by voting in the form of a raised hand. If any member of the commission presents such a request, voting shall be performed in secret, using ballot papers. The presented members of the committee can not abstain from voting. The voting is supervised by the chairperson of the examining committee, with the committee deciding by a majority vote.        
  3. If the committee for the defense of dissertation thesis assesses the grading as "failed", it shall determine whether it is necessary to rewrite or supplement the thesis; a repeated defense is possible within six months at the earliest.

 

Defense of Dissertation Thesis - Administrative Procedure

D = the day the defense is held

D-60 days

 

Students submit an Application form for the defense of the dissertation to the study department along with the advisor's assessment of the course of the doctoral studies with a statement on the fulfilment of all study obligations including the state doctoral examination:

·         2 exemplars of the dissertation thesis in fixed or ring binding, both exemplars may be in ring binding unless the institute stipulates otherwise

·         2 printed exemplars of propositions (in the range of 15-20 pages), the student will also send them electronically to the relevant member of study department

·         At the same time, the student will upload the dissertation thesis to the SIS.

 A copy of the application form will be sent by the study department to the institute.

The application form for the defense of the dissertation thesis can only be submitted upon successful passing of the state doctoral examination and fulfilment of all other obligations according to the ISP.

D-60-40 days  

The subject board will discuss the proposal of the committee and set the date for the defense of the dissertation thesis (possible by per rollam voting).

·           a proposal for the appointment of a committee for the defense of dissertation thesis is submitted to the Dean of FSV UK by the chairperson of the subject board.                        

 

A committee for the defense of dissertation thesis assigns two opponents of the thesis (three opponents in case of the IES). The opponents are subsequently confirmed by the Dean of the faculty.

 

The Administrator (Center for Doctoral Studies or a staff member of the institute responsible for administering doctoral studies) will arrange a reservation of the room for the defense.

 

The administrator will provide a person who, in the course of the defense, will make a Record of the course of the defense.

D-40 days

The administrator will send to the opponents a request for their statements together with the thesis in pdf format.

Opponents receive the relevant dissertation thesis no later than 40 days before the defense takes place. If an opponent wishes to see the thesis in its physical form, the administrator will send the request together with contact details to the study department.

At the same time, the administrator sends an invitation to the opponents to the defense of the dissertation thesis.

D-21 days

The study department will electronically submit the propositions of the dissertation thesis to the members of the committee.

The study department sends an official invitation to the defense to the committee members and a student.

D-14 days

The study department will post in the public part of the faculty's website information on the defense of the dissertation thesis with exact time schedules.

D-10 days

Opponents are required to submit their signed statements at least 10 days before the defense to the institute. Opponents will produce their statements in the extent of a minimum of 2 standard pages. The statements must be an evaluation of the dissertation thesis (not only a description of its content), and at the end of the statement the opponent will specify whether the submitted dissertation  thesis complies with the content and formal requirements placed on this type of theses and will explicitly state whether s/he recommends it for the defense or not. The institute (administrator) will send the opponents’ statements to the student.

D-1 week

The study department will send via email to the institute:

  • attendance sheet
  • voting ballots
  • record of the ballot
  • record of the course of the defense

    D

In the course of the defense, the administrator or another authorized person shall fill in the Record of the course of the defense.

The defense of the dissertation thesis is public.

The defense of the dissertation thesis is graded as “passed” – “failed”.

Only members of the committee can vote, the opponents of the thesis do not vote. The advisor votes if s/he is a member of the committee.

·           The Record of the ballot is filled in. The result of the defense will be added to the Record of the course of the defense - "passed" - "failed". It is signed by the chairperson and at least one other member of the committee.    

D+1

The institute will send to the study department (an original copy):

  • attendance sheet
  • record of the course of the defense
  • record of the ballot
  • voting ballots (if used)
  • signed opponents’ statements, unless already signed and delivered to the study department.

D+1 week

The study department will enter into the student’s file:

  • a copy of the approval of the appointment of the committee by the Dean of FSV
  • appointment of the opponents of the thesis confirmed by the Dean of FSV
  • a completed and signed form of the Record of the course of the defense
  • attendance sheet
  • voting ballots (if used)

The study department will ensure the finalization and availability of the dissertation thesis, the opponents' statements and the results of the defense in the SIS.

 

Article 8

Final Provision

The provision herein cancels the Dean’s Provision no. 6/2014 governing the organization of doctoral studies at FSV UK.

                                                                                             

PhDr. Jakub Končelík, Ph.D.

                                                                                                         the Dean of FSV UK

In charge of accuracy:

PhDr. Petr Bednařík, Ph.D.

Vice-Dean for the Conception and Quality of Studies and Doctoral Studies