Elections to AS FSV UK

Elections to AS FSV UK

AS FSV UK announces electronic elections to the Academic Senate of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University for the term of office 2023–2025 from November 29 to November 30, 2022. The elections will take place electronically and will begin on November 29, 2022, at 9:00 am and end on November 30, 2022, at 6:00 pm.

AS FSV UK has set a deadline for submission of proposals for candidates. They can be submitted between 17 October (9:00 am) and 11 November 2022 (2:30 pm) through the FSV UK mailroom (Hollar, Smetanovo nábřeží 6, Prague 1), the faculty's data box, and by e-mail to the Election Commission's mailbox volby.as@fsv.cuni.cz. Candidate lists will be published no later than 7 days before the first day of the election.  Candidates can send their election programs to the AS FSV UK secretary Tereza Volfová to be published on the fakulty website.

Candidate proposal form

Address for sending the candidate's proposal by post:

Election Commission of the AS FSV UK
Faculty of Social Sciences of Charles University
Smetanovo nábřeží 6
110 01 Praha 1

Proposals submitted after the deadline, proposals submitted in a manner other than the above-mentioned or proposals not containing all the necessary elements according to the Electoral Regulations of the AS FSV UK, Article 4 will not be registered for the elections.

 

Election Results

Academic Chamber

In accordance with the requirement that each institute be represented by the candidate with the highest number of votes, mandates were allocated to the following senators in the first round:

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Michal Parízek IPS 777
2. Pavel Szobi IMS 552
3. Martin Štoll ICSJ 516
4. Magdalena Mouralová ISS 511
5. Magda Pečená IES 435

The following were also elected:

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Jaromír Soukup IPS 751
2. Jakub Stauber IPS 565
3. Eliška Ullrichová IMS 491
4. Petra Koudelková ICSJ 473
5. Veronika Macková ICSJ 466

The substitutes are (in this order - the order of substitutes with the same number of votes was determined by lot):

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Jitka Wirthová ISS 440
2. Ondřej Trunečka ICSJ 440
3. Michal Červinka IES 346

 

Student Chamber

In accordance with the requirement that each institute be represented by the candidate with the highest number of votes, mandates were allocated to the following senators in the first round:

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Magdalena Hynčíková IPS 615
2. Michaela Němcová IMS 528
3. Kristýna Sluková ICSJ 514
4. Barbora Procházková ISS 499
5. Gabriela Bošňáková IES 348

The following were also elected:

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Jan Volenec IPS 519
2. Barbora Součková ISCJ 478
3. Tomáš Košek IMS 425
4. Michael Drašar IPS 424
5. Tomáš Popov ICSJ 409

The substitutes are (in this order):

Order Name Institute Number of votes
1. Aidan Thomas Macready ICSJ 395
2. Pavel Buchta IMS 364
3. Ondřej Hlaváč ICSJ 356
4. Daniel Saifrt ISS 349
5. Tomáš Fencl IES 341
6. Jan Kašík ISS 262

Final report of FSV UK Election Commission on the results of the elections to the Academic Senate of the Faculty of Social Sciences UK (AS FSV UK) for the term of office 1. 2. 2023 – 31. 1. 2025

Statement of the Election Commission on the issue of lecturers without generated election voucher

In the course of the election, several lecturers contacted the election commission to inform them that the election voucher was not delivered to them. In all cases, these were employees classified in the L1 category.

The Commission examined the applicable regulations and noted the following:

  • Rector's measure 56/2021 stipulates that L1 does not belong to the academic staff in the sense of §70 of the Higher Education Act
  • §3 of the Higher Education Act stipulates that members of the academic community are academic staff and students
  • Article 6, paragraph 1 of the FSV UK Election Rules states that all members of the academic cummunity have the right to vote.

It follows from the above that employees classified in the L1 category do not currently have voting rights for elections to the AS FSV UK.

The Election Commission appeals to the AS FSV UK to check the situation of the lecturers classified in the L1 category regarding their active/passive voting rights before the announcement of the next elections.

Election application instructions

Candidates

Academic Chamber

Candidate No. Name Institute Election Programme
1. Pavel Szobi IMS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

 

2.

Michal Parízek IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

3. Magdalena Mouralová ISS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

4. Martin Štoll ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

5. Ondřej Trunečka ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

6. Petra Koudelková ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

7. Jakub Stauber IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

8. Michal Červinka IES

IES and ICSJ joint programme

9. Eliška Ullrichová IMS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

10. Jaromír Soukup IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

11. Veronika Macková ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

12. Magda Pečená IES

IES and ICSJ joint programme

13. Jitka Wirthová ISS

recommended distribution of votes

Student Chamber

Candidate No. Name Institute Election Programme
1. Barbora Procházková ISS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

2. Aidan Thomas Macready ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

3. Michael Drašar IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

4. Tomáš Popov ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

5. Michaela Němcová IMS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

6.

Jan Kašík ISS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

7. Barbora Součková ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

8. Kristýna Sluková ICSJ

IES and ICSJ joint programme

9. Jan Volenec IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

10. Daniel Saifrt ISS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

11. Tomáš Košek IMS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

12. Pavel Buchta IMS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

13. Magdalena Hynčíková IPS

candidate profile

recommended distribution of votes

14. Ondřej Hlaváč ICSJ  
15. Gabriela Bošňáková IES

IES and ICSJ joint programme

16. Tomáš Fencl IES

IES and ICSJ joint programme

Election committee

Members of the committee

  • Lucie dos Santosová da Silva
  • Jakub Tesař
  • Tomáš Barták
  • Ivan Petrúšek
  • Kateřina Turková
  • Jan Křovák
  • Matěj Mišoň - chairman
  • Miroslav Palanský
  • Tomáš Brabec
  • Jan Váška

 

The meaning of the Academic senate and importance of elections

The Academic Senate of FSV UK is the key controlling institution of the Faculty. Through the Academic Senate you can influence the running of your faculty, just like in any other political election.

It is composed of ten students and ten teachers. Senators and senators look under the hands of the faculty management, checking, for example, the preparation of the budget, management, but also the quality of teaching.  For example, it is important for the student academic community that the student chamber of the Academic Senate distributes money to student societies. From this money, students can then organise various events that may not even be directly related to their studies. Whether it is a sports day, a beer pentathlon or debates with various interesting guests, student money always comes in handy when organising.

In addition, the Senate deals with matters directly related to study. Currently, the Study Committee has been dealing with the quality of studies for Ukrainian students for a long time, and the same committee also regularly analyses feedback from students. The Senate also works closely together in the development of the timetable for each academic year, trying to accommodate students as much as possible.

However, the Academic Senators are not unknown to students. Each of them also acts as a liaison between students and the faculty management. As a body, the Senate is a support for students and helps to solve their problems. For example, the Social Commission is in charge of the student ombudsmen project, which was created specifically to improve conditions for students and teachers, but theSocial Comission has also created, for example, a communication decalogue.